11 thoughts on “Asus and Ubuntu in Portugal

  1. If that ASUS 1215P is running Ubuntu 10.10 netbook remix, it only has official support until next April. And reading the certified hardware database for this model its only certified for special OEM vendor pre-install images of 10.10. So come April people who purchase this unit have an interesting choice to make. Stay with the end of life 10.10 with no vendor support or do an upgrade to a version that is not certified for the hardware and will most likely see hardware support regressions of some nature. Is this unit going to be certified for 12.04 LTS stock Ubuntu? And isn’t the netbook remix interface officially no longer supported? If the upgrade to 12.04 LTS even if it is certified for their hardware aren’t the forced to move to a completely new interface? Is that really a good thing for a retail electronics product?

    1. That sure appears to be the Ubuntu 10.04 UNR to me (as opposed to the Ubuntu 10.10 UNE which looks more like unity and runs on mutter.) Although the company has officially announced EOL on the 10.04 UNR, it seems at bit disingenuous and mostly inaccurate to me.

      It seems to me that how security and stability maintenance updates are provided is by replacing a given package in the repository with a newer version which is then downloaded and installed by the end users in the normal update process (likely using update-manager or apt-get.) Since the UNR 32-bit (i386) shares the repositories with the Desktop edition which will be kept updated through April of 2013, it will indeed share the general 32-bit Ubuntu 10.04 maintenance updates with the exception of the packages unique to the UNR.

      In order words, if a user is fine with the fact that no furthers updates will be provided to those uniquely UNR packages (of which there are not many), s/he can merely let it ride and keep receiving all the other updates (such as linux kernel, xorg, OpenOffice, rhythmbox, etc.) through the Ubuntu 10.04 Desktop EOL?

  2. Victor,
    As a business that is competing with Android, the consumer device story has to get tighter than it is right now. A year to qualify a retail shelf product leaving it with a 6 month usable lifetime before the OS itself is no longer supported by the vendor isn’t going to cut it….not with the general consumer electronics crowd.

    I’m not saying you have to go to a completely open ended support lifecycle like Android uses…but something has to change if Canonical is serious about moving past the desktop form factor and into retail store shelves.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s